Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook McEnany says Juneteenth is a very ‘meaningful’ day to Trump MORE (D-Calif.) signaled openness on Wednesday to expanding the Supreme Court amid what she called a “crisis of confidence” created by Republicans in the nation’s high court.
Bloomberg reported that Harris, asked in Nashua, N.H., whether she would support adding as many as four justices to the bench, said she was “open” to the conversation.
“I’m open to this conversation about increasing the number of people on the United States Supreme Court,” the 2020 presidential candidate said, according to Bloomberg.
Harris also expressed openness to limiting how many justices one president can nominate and applying term limits to justices, according to the news outlet.
Brian Fallon, a former Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE campaign staffer who runs the liberal advocacy group Demand Justice, told Bloomberg her reply was “a welcome signal from Harris.”
“Especially with Roe so clearly under assault, we cannot settle for the status quo when it comes to the Supreme Court,” Fallon said, referring to the landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. “The court is too partisan in its makeup and has too little regard for precedent. Democrats need to think boldly.”
Click Here: Golf special
Harris has signaled openness to court-packing before, telling Politico in March “We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court … we have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”
The question came from an audience member at a campaign stop who said the Republican-controlled Senate “stole” Justice Neil Gorsuch’s seat by refusing to hold a vote on then-President Obama’s nominee to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, Merrick GarlandMerrick Brian GarlandDon’t mess with the Supreme Court Graham on potential Supreme Court vacancy: ‘This would be a different circumstance’ than Merrick Garland Prosecutor who resigned over Stone sentencing memo joins DC attorney general’s office MORE.
The possibility of expanding the Supreme Court has emerged as a key litmus test in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary field, which has ballooned to 22 candidates.
South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegScaled-back Pride Month poses challenges for fundraising, outreach Biden hopes to pick VP by Aug. 1 It’s as if a Trump operative infiltrated the Democratic primary process MORE and former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke (Texas) have both signaled they could back expanding the high court.
“I think the question is whether or not they’re out of touch with just how partisan and illegitimate this Supreme Court has become in its willingness to throw out precedent and sort of the way it’s undermining the rule of law,” Chris Kang, the chief counsel for Demand Justice, said in March. “They need to come to terms with that in order to really help lead and to help push the progressive policy platform forward.”